Sunday, February 27, 2011

Speed The Plow in Summit




When my friend Robert Barwick told me he was to play Bobby Gould in Speed The Plow, I let out a silent moan.  I had seen two Broadway productions and both left me looking at my watch most of the time.  Once with Joe Mategna, Ron Silver and Madonna, the other with Bill Macy, Raul Esperanza and Elizabeth Moss.  If star power couldn't help this weak David Mamet piece, I doubted the good folks at The Summit Playhouse could invigorate it.  I knew I had to go support my friend, but was dreading it.

Well, I was wrong and it's testament to a great director and ensemble cast who played the difficult rhythms and staccatos of Mamet like a great Stradivarius.  

The 3-person, no intermission, play is set in Hollywood in the late 80s.  Bobby has just been promoted to head of production of a major studio, and his old friend Charlie brings him a script that will make them both rich.  The fix is in, a meeting with the studio head is set, and they have Bobby's temporary assistant arrange a lunch table.

Of course it's not set, and later that night the assistant convinces Bobby to ditch the commercial piece and make a "meaningful "piece instead.

I won't ruin the ending, but will say no one does desperation like Mamet.  Like his other works American Buffalo and Glengarry Glen Ross,  in Speed The Plow Mamet plumbs the depth of how far an individual  is willing to go to get what he wants.  His characters are spiritually and morally bankrupt, if not occasionally very, very funny.

As played by James Ryan Sloan, Charlie Fox is a wonder to behold.  Driven and by years of watching other people make it in Hollywood (including his friend Bobby), he knows this deal could be his last chance at fortune and he throws himself into selling it with the force of a Category 4 storm.  Mr. Sloan's comic timing is perfection, if not once in a while a bit over-the-top.  But you don't mind.  All movement and motivation, he will get what he wants and when does, will get his revenge.

Danielle Pennisi as Karen, the temp., leads us down a circuitous path of ethical conviction and you believe every word.  Robert Barwick is the consummate straight man.  He's kept his head down, played by the rules, and is now reaping the rewards.   Watching him make the agonizing choice between right and wrong, between moral and immoral, is like watching a parent who smoked pot in college find dope in their teenagers room.  What to do, what to do.  Sex, greed, ethics -- Bobby Gould is just trying to make it by other people's rules until he is in a position to make his own rules.

As directed by Trey Compton, who has a number of professional directing and assistant director credits to his name, the play moves like speeding freight train.  Making movies and lunching at the right restaurant are serious business, and his characters inhabit the entire stage, turn their backs to the audience, throw art, smoke, talk over and subtly (and not so subtly) seduce each other, to get what they want. These are Hollywood brats at their most brattiness, and Mr. Compton's direction is spot on.

A couple of needling points -- in image-obsessed Hollywood no one would ever walk around in a suit that was too big for them, and the costumes were distracting.  Ms. Pennisi's hair was a bit overwrought (she's a double for Jane Kusak in Shameless) and while the set was imaginative, I doubt Bobby would live in a such a traditional setting.

But these are small points.  I often wonder what playwrights and pieces will still be produced fifty years from now.  Who will be our modern equivalents to Tennessee Williams and Arthur Miller?  Their plays are still produced because while set in a different time, their universal themes are so well explored -- lust, regret, loss.  Thank you Trey et. al. for making me rethink David Mamet and hoping that when I turn 95 there might be another Broadway revival of Speed The Plow that so adeptly captures the greed, desperation, and comedy that inhabit us all.

Friday, February 25, 2011

One Squashed Spidey



There is a moment towards the end of Act 1 of Spider-Man: Turn off the Dark where it all comes together.  You forget the costumes are plastic, don’t mind the insipid lyrics, and willingly suspend belief as The Green Hornet and Spiderman do battle 100 feet above you at The Foxwoods Theater.  These are some of the best aerial gymnastics this side of Circque de Soleil.  You and the five year old next to you are equally dazzled. 

Unfortunately it is only a moment and you are quickly snapped back to the reality of this over produced, over-the-top, over-hyped, vacuous musical. 

What little story there is revolves around a group of teenagers creating a Spiderman comic book.  They seemed chosen for the target audience, one of each: The nerd, the cool kid, the every kid and the smarter Asian-American girl who wants to play with the boys.  Spider-Man comes to life through their imaginations.  A school trip to a gene-splicing lab features an environment- crazed scientist, and, you guessed it – a spider bite.   Peter Parker, the kid everyone loves to pick on (and the inspiration for a particularly ridiculous musical number "Bullying By Numbers") is transformed into Spider-Man!  For the rest of Act I Spiderman fights the scientist who is transformed into the Green Goblin, and a confusing Act II sees him splitting his attention between fighting bad guys and choosing between his two loves – a human and a spider.  I am not kidding. 

Bono and the Edge from the rock group U2 did the music and lyrics.

Rock musicals have a hit or miss history on Broadway.  They sell seats and bring a non-traditional audience to live theater, but too often the music and story don’t match.   That is forgivable when the musical itself is celebrating and exploring the body of work of an artist in a new and different way – Billy Joel and Moving Out, for example, or Green Day and American Idiot. 

But Spiderman: Turn off the Dark has much bigger aspirations which fail miserably. Original unmemorable music, coupled with ridiculous lyrics (“You can change your mind, but you can’t change your heart”) neither move the story along nor live on after the curtain descends. 

The performances are across the board excellent and you feel for them as they forced to sing and dance in ultra-confining costumes and flying apparatus.  Rock performer Reeve Carney in his Broadway debut as Spiderman has the right look and voice.  I particularly enjoyed watching theater veteran Patrick Page as The Green Hornet – this is a once-in-a-lifetime part and he looked like he was having tons of fun. 

The musical reportedly is the most expensive ever mounted on Broadway, costing approximately $60 million.  What does that buy you these days?  Lots of electronics and paper mache.  In the Lion King director Julie Taymor used elaborate sets and costumes to create effects that transcended the effects themselves.  Live theater only becomes magic when all the parts are working together to create something greater than its individual parts.  Here, we have dazzling effects, but without the heart and soul coming from story and performance that make you care. 

And that is the real problem with Spider-Man: Turn off the Dark.  It has no soul and for all the money spent, very little magic.  So instead of caring about the characters, you focus on the eight different sets of shoes each of the chorus of dancing arachnoids are wearing.  You wonder mystically at what era the action is supposed to be taking place, and why while the sets are cartoon cutouts, Peter Parker’s jacket, featuring, yes, an embroidered spider, is ultra-2011 hip.

With all these miss matching elements, this is one lofty spider that deserves to be the on the receiving end of a rolled up newspaper.

NOTE: There has been a lot of controversy over the extended preview period and a group of prominent critics decided to violate theater convention and print their reviews before opening night.  Given the complexity of the staging and the expense an out of town preview period would have entailed, I understand the producers decision to keep delaying the opening.   The effects in the performance I saw were flawlessly executed, and I disagree with the decision of the New York Times, et. al. However, it did allow for this really funny video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPH7vZ3Rev8