Friday, August 1, 2008

Three Sisters

The first lines Chekhov writes in Three Sisters, currently being staged by The Williamstown Theater Festival, Olga Prozorov, the eldest sister, tells us that it is one year ago to the day that their father died, but now everything is fine. It is Irina’s, the youngest sister, birthday and today there is to be a celebration. Then there was snow and despair, but today there are flowers and happiness. Soon Olga and Irina will be leaving their provincial home and moving to Moscow, where they will enjoy the sophisticated life and meet the men of their dreams.

But it is not to be. For the next two and half hours we are presented with a montage of misery and despair piled high and deep as snow in a Siberian February, as each of the Prozorov sisters and their coterie discovers that with age comes disappointment. Marriages fail, family and friends disappoint, wealth departs, and life is a continuous exercise in existential nothingness.

Cheery huh. Well, that’s not the point. What has always fascinated me about Chekhov’s plays is the time when he was writing them. Russia was collapsing under the weight of a serf based land system akin to slavery, with an indolent upper class that could barely communicate with their own servants. The servants spoke Russian, the nobles spoke French.

While industrialization was changing the face of America and Western Europe, Russia was still mired in an aguarian based system where labor -- or any sort of work -- was considered low. Of all the plays in the Chekhovian cannon, Three Sisters is probably the one that modern audience must most appreciate in the context and times in which it was written. While the central story line of The Cherry Orchard concerns the loss of property and the downward spiral of the upper class, Three Sisters is about the personal feelings and longings associated with such dramatic societal change. These are specific people in a time and place, and to understand them it is important to understand the times in which they are living.

Is their plight universal? Perhaps, but not so self consciously.

So we have Olga, Masha, and Irina. Three Sisters who live in provincial capital and dream of escape – Olga and Irina to Moscow, Masha into the arms of the Army Commandant and away from her failed marriage. We have Andrei, their brother, who once had a promising career as a scientist, but winds up mortgaging the family estate to support his gambling habit and trapped in loveless marriage to a shrieking virago. We have Ivan, an elderly friend and border who once loved the sister’s mother, but has now escaped into the bottle to forget his loneliness. And we have Vershinin, the Army Commandant, whose second wife has gone mad and longs for the very married but very vivacious Masha.

While each of Chekhov’s characters has their dreams, they are all stuck; stuck in time and place, with their feelings and desires descending into endless longing.

This is a bold production full of choices. Jessica Hecht play Olga with the giddy nervousness of a women who has spent far too many years bottling up her feelings and seems about to go mad. Jonathon Fried gives an over-the-top performance as Kulygin, Masha’s husband, a high school teacher content with his life, who can only watch as his beloved wife drifts farther and farther away. Rebecca De Witt, as Masha, is full of rage that quickly turns to passion in the arms of her forbidden lover. Natasha, Andrei’s wife, as performed by Cassie Beck, is every bit the evil monster she is meant to be.

One wonders why Director Michael Grief chose to place the Act One dining table in the back of the set, where key lines must be screamed to be heard; or why the Act Two finale set consists of a long ramp where characters must turn their back to the audience to see who is entering. It all seems a bit of jumbled mess, much like the characters on stage.

As the curtain descends, Irina repeats “Why must we suffer, if only we knew…if only we knew.” If you want a Russian history lesson and don’t mind watching lots of suffering in the process, Three Sisters is just the ticket.

--- July 26, 2008

The Understudy

Here’s the setup – a big action movie star has taken a role on Broadway opposite an even bigger action movie star. A nobody shows up to rehearse the understudy role for a big action movie star. It turns out that the stage manager and the nobody were once engaged. The action star doesn’t really want to work with the nobody, but eventually sees that he brings a talent to the role that is sorely lacking. The bigger action star (cleverly referred to as “Bruce”) winds up stealing a role from the smaller action star adding more dramatic tension. Throw in some references to Franz Kafka, and you have a pleasant 90 minutes in the theater courtesy of up-and-coming playwright Theresa Rebeck.

None of it is really outloud funny, and the actors do the best with the material they have to work with. Reg Rogers plays the title character and has the moments in the play. When he is rehearsing the Kafka scenes, he brings the stage alive. The action star is played by Bradley Cooper, is all tan muscle and sunstreaked hair. He never really rises above the stereotypical “movie star.” Kristen Johnston, of 3rd Rock fame, rounds out the small cast as The Stage Manager, where she screams a lot.

Ms. Rebeck likes to work in the world of motives – I greatly enjoyed the MTC production of her play Mauritius last season, where her characters see and seize opportunity. They were in control of their world, and the drama came from the clash of these individual motives. In The Understudy, her characters are not in control of their destinies and “stuff” just happens to them. A cell phone rings, and it could be doom or bliss. An assistant might or might not turn the lights on. They all have reasons and motives for being there, but they effect each other to a minimal degree. All in all, it makes for not particularly interesting – or funny – theater.